Great News!!

John A. Quayle blueoval57 at VERIZON.NET
Wed May 7 10:54:35 MDT 2008

    You deserve some good news <>

May 7th, 2008 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Academe 
<>, Culture 
<>, First Amendment 
<>, Gay agenda 
<>, Global governance 
<>, Human Rights 
<> |

*You deserve some good news*

By Donald Hank

Recently Joseph Farah suggested that despite the bad batch of 
presidential candidates from which to choose, he is optimistic, because 
he believes our institutions are changing in a positive way. I believe 
he is on to something. Last year WND's hardcopy periodical Whistleblower 
dedicated an entire issue to abortion. Despite the dismal reports it 
contained, eg, that more unborn babies had died in abortions since 
Wade-Roe than in Hitler's and Stalin's murder sprees combined, the whole 
tenor of the issue was upbeat. The good news was that it was becoming 
increasingly difficult to find doctors to perform abortions. This in 
turn, I think, was certainly due to the excellent work done on the front 
lines by ordinary people writing letters to legislators and newspapers, 
attending rallies or carrying posters and picketing at strategic 
locations throughout the US. There had always been a lot of controversy 
over those posters with graphic photos of dead fetuses and their body 
parts, which are certainly hard to look at and take us way out of our 
comfort zone.

But oddly, many of the people who hated these posters and the truth they 
display so graphically were the ones who wound up giving ground on the 
issue of abortion. These included prominent Democrats and even some of 
the pioneers of the abortion movement.

The truth, resisted so fiercely for so long, had ultimately sunk in and 
had had a devastating effect on the abortion industry. So much so that 
no matter who becomes president, they will have to contend with an 
increasingly mighty backlash against abortion, and the prospect of 
giving ground or losing popularity.

Likewise, in one of our recent article 
<>s, we saw how author Ryan 
Sorba's speech at Smith College was curtailed by a bunch of howling 
lesbian termagants.

Someone who saw this article emailed me in a pessimistic tone suggesting 
the world may be coming to an end or the like because of this incident. 
I told this emailer not to worry, that things like this fix themselves 
when the public becomes aware of how their rights are being threatened.

I was thinking back on things that had happened in the past that would 
cause people gloom but that were corrected when the news came out, and 
not by coincidence, but precisely because the news came out and was 
presented in an objective way that showed how the event in question was 
a threat to this or that right.

For example, consider last summer's failed amnesty bill that was killed 
by the grassroots in an elitist Senate that was suddenly overpowered by 
regular people like you and me. Or look at the Security and Prosperity 
Partnership (SPP), an issue that came to a head when the presidents of 
the US, Mexico and Canada met secretly in Canada. The public outcry was 
so great that ranking officials have recently declared the SPP a dead 
issue. Of course, that means that it will morph into something else, 
which in turn will have to be exposed to the sunlight.

The good news is that the public outcry against supranational 
enterprises of this type has helped chip away at the stealthy 
effectiveness with which they had once succeeded almost unopposed. 
Laigle's Forum played a part with some of our articles beginning back in 
June 2006 with a 3 part series containing: an original column entitled 
The supranational movement 
our translation from the HazteOir web site (in Spain) entitled The call 
effect in Spain 
and our translation (from the Portuguese) of Olavo de Carvalho's 
scholarly expose Behind the subversion 
<>, and later 
others, including my column at WorldNetDaily entitled Europe's frog stew 
<> and a 
column entitled The EU is an evil empire 

But getting back to the riot at Smith College, here is why I am no 
longer worried that our First Amendment may not survive the homosexual 

Today there was this video 
at ABC News that shows a sea change.

Now don't be surprised if ABC has taken it down by the time you click. 
But the damage has been done, and not to our side, but to the homosexual 
cause. This video is the first report I have ever seen presented at a 
mainstream news site (I assume it aired on TV) in which the reporter 
actually show objectively how homosexual bullies deny people their 
rights, muzzle opponents and squelch debate.

What really stunned me was that, with a candor and balance I have never 
seen in the mainstream news, the reporter tells us that a member of the 
American Psychiatric Association had tried for 2 years to organize a 
symposium discussing why people become gay and whether a gay can "go 
straight," but that the gay community had staged a protest so vigorous 
that the symposium had to be cancelled. Until this time, the public had 
not been privy to the fact that the gay agenda is directly opposed to 
free discussion. The report concludes:

"He [the organizer of the symposium] wishes people would stop shouting 
and start talking."

I have been outspoken about homosexual issues 
<> in 
the past and was never intimidated by these activists. I like to think 
this is because I have always taken my orders from my 
Commander-in-Chief, who said I was to love sinners. My theory is that 
perhaps those who shy away from confrontations, or give in to "gay" 
marriage demands, for example, are those who down inside really do hate, 
resent or fear gay people and are afraid these untoward feelings might 
surface in a confrontation (as they did, for example, when Michael 
Savage told a homosexual caller: "you should die of AIDS"). At any rate, 
for whatever reason, by and large, the media, including most of the 
"conservative" media, have always been particularly gutless in 
countering or even questioning the gay agenda.

But ABC has started a trend that, in my perception, is new. It was long 

I also suspect that Ben Stein's expose of academic intolerance has 
actually shaken more than a few consciences, just like those pro-life 
activists who mightily smote the national conscience, and his film 
/Expelled/ may in fact have influenced ABC's reporters.

At any rate, for whatever reason, ABC did the right thing in suggesting 
that the screaming stop and the talk begin.

Thank you, ABC!

My point is that no matter how bad our next president is or how much he 
or she differs from the grassroots in terms of viewpoint, politicians 
are not omnipotent. They rely on a certain degree of popularity to carry 
out their agendas. You and I still decide whether they get that.

And God decides whether or not they succeed.


We had previously reported on the Holmen church-and-state issue where a 
national atheist organization tried to sue to have a religious symbol 
removed. Here is Anthony Horvath's latest report:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list