[SPAM] Re: Let the Lethal Injections Commence

John A. Quayle blueoval57 at VERIZON.NET
Wed May 7 10:50:24 MDT 2008


/*Yes, that's the law, JD.

John Q.
*/
JD wrote:
> I wonder if they use an antiseptic swab before they insert the needle.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ernie Lane <ernielane at verizon.net 
> <mailto:ernielane at verizon.net>> wrote:
>
>     Carl Spitzer wrote:
>
>         On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 01:11 -0600, Richard Whitenight wrote:
>
>             By a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court has overturned a
>             lower court
>             decision that death by lethal injection was
>             un-constitutional, being
>             cruel and inhumane punishment. The SCOTUS' decision
>             basically lifts
>             the ban on the death penalty, meaning Texas can resume their
>             executions.
>
>         To die like a pet is too good for human scum.
>
>
>     To me, the concept that execution should be absolutely painless
>     makes no sense, but it seems that's the direction we're heading,
>     regardless of this decision.
>
>     Now, I'm just as 'humane' as the next guy, and do not think we
>     should deliberately inflict pain in the execution process.  But
>     there are humans on both sides of this activity, which means it's
>     imperfect.  Our goal should be to make it painfree, but you can
>     only do so much, and while we should do the best we can, we should
>     not demand nor expect perfection.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20080507/f74e91be/attachment.html 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list