The Anti-Federalists were Right

John Quayle blueoval57 at VERIZON.NET
Mon Mar 5 09:11:56 MST 2007



The Anti-Federalists Were Right

by <mailto:lmvance at juno.com>Laurence M. Vance
by Laurence M. Vance

<http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.co
<http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.co
   <http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
Email a link to this article
<http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
Email a link to this article
   <http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
Printer-friendly version of this article
<http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
Printer-friendly version of this article
   <http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
View a list of the most popular articles on our site
<http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html#>
View a list of the most popular articles on our site

<http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance106.html&title=The%20Anti-Federalists%20Were%20Right&topic=political_opinion>DIGG 
THIS

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal 
government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State 
governments are numerous and indefinite."

~ James Madison, Federalist No. 45

History has shown this statement to be either wishful thinking or a 
deliberate falsehood. Regardless of which opinion you hold, the 
Anti-Federalists were right. They correctly predicted the unlimited power 
of a consolidated government under the Constitution. Not only were the 
Anti-Federalists right to a degree that they could never have imagined; I 
seriously doubt that the Federalists could have envisioned or would have 
approved of their new government becoming the monstrosity that it now is.

The U.S. Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787. Nine states were 
needed to ratify the new Constitution. On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire 
became the ninth state, and the Confederation Congress began making plans 
for the transition to government under the Constitution. Virginia ratified 
the document on June 25, 1788, and New York followed on July 26, 1788. On 
March 4, 1789 – 218 years ago yesterday – the new Constitution took effect, 
replacing the Articles of Confederation that had been in force since 1781. 
North Carolina did not ratify the Constitution until November 21, 1789, and 
Rhode Island not until May 29, 1790.

Although the arguments of the Anti-Federalists against the new Constitution 
were numerous and varied, there is one thing that underlies them all: The 
danger to liberty from a strong central government.

The term Anti-Federalists is a misnomer. A federal government is a 
decentralized government. Yet, those who called themselves Federalists 
wanted a stronger central government. Writing in the (Baltimore) Maryland 
Gazette in 1788, an Anti-Federalist who called himself "A Farmer" clearly 
recognized this abuse of language:

There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one 
which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be 
called, national government; the other which binds States and governments 
together . . . this last has heretofore been denominated a league or 
confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to 
themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution. 
This abuse of language does not help the cause; every degree of imposition 
serves only to irritate, but can never convince. They are national men, and 
their opponents, or at least a great majority of them, are federal, in the 
only true and strict sense of the word.

The question is a simple one, as stated by the Anti-Federalist "Brutus" in 
his first essay in the New York Journal in 1787:

The first question that presents itself on the subject is, whether a 
confederated government be the best for the United States or not? Or in 
other words, whether the thirteen United States should be reduced to one 
great republic, governed by one legislature, and under the direction of one 
executive and judicial; or whether they should continue thirteen 
confederated republics, under the direction and controul of a supreme 
federal head for certain defined national purposes only? This enquiry is 
important, because, although the government reported by the convention does 
not go to a perfect and entire consolidation, yet it approaches so near to 
it, that it must, if executed, certainly and infallibly terminate in it.

To put it briefly, the Anti-Federalists concluded that the Constitution 
granted too much power to the federal government.

"Cato" wrote a series of letters that appeared in the New York Journal 
between September 1787 and January 1788. This is from his third letter:

The recital, or premises on which the new form of government is erected, 
declares a consolidation or union of all the thirteen parts, or states, 
into one great whole, under the form of the United States, for all the 
various and important purposes therein set forth. – But whoever seriously 
considers the immense extent of territory comprehended within the limits of 
the United States, together with the variety of its climates, productions, 
and commerce, the difference of extent, and number of inhabitants in all; 
the dissimilitude of interest, morals, and politics, in almost every one, 
will receive it as an intuitive truth, that a consolidated republican form 
of government therein, can never form a perfect union, establish justice, 
insure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the 
blessings of liberty to you and your posterity.

"Centinel" wrote a series of letters that appeared in the Philadelphia 
Independent Gazetteer in late 1787 and early 1788. Here are selections from 
his eleventh, twelfth, and sixteenth letters:

If anarchy, therefore, were the inevitable consequence of rejecting the new 
constitution, it would be infinitely better to incur it; for even then 
there would be at least the change of a good government rising out of 
licentiousness.

That investigation into the nature and construction of the new 
constitution, which the conspirators have so long and zealously struggled 
against, has, notwithstanding their partial success, so far taken place as 
to ascertain the enormity of their criminality. That system which was 
pompously displayed as the perfection of government, proves upon 
examination to be the most odious system of tyranny that was ever 
projected, a many headed hydra of despotism, whose complication and various 
evils would be infinitely more oppressive and afflictive than the scourge 
of any single tyrant.

The new constitution instead of being the panacea or cure of every 
grievance so delusively represented by its advocates will be found upon 
examination like Pandora’s box, replete with every evil.

The "Federal Farmer" wrote for the Poughkeepsie Country Journal in 1787. 
His letters were soon afterward published in pamphlet form. This is from 
his first letter:

The plan of government now proposed is evidently calculated totally to 
change, in time, our condition as a people. Instead of being thirteen 
republics, under a federal head, it is clearly designed to make us one 
consolidated government. . . . Whether such a change can ever be effected, 
in any manner; whether it can be effected without convulsions and civil 
wars; whether such a change will not totally destroy the liberties of this 
country – time only can determine.

Like those of Centinel, the essays of an "Old Whig" appeared in 
Philadelphia’s Independent Gazetteer in late 1787 and early 1788. This is 
from his second essay:

The new constitution vests Congress with such unlimited powers as ought 
never to be entrusted to any men or body of men.

The essays of an unknown Anti-Federalist who used the name of "John DeWitt" 
were published in the Boston American Herald in late 1787. This is from his 
third essay:

Upon an attentive examination you can pronounce it nothing less, than a 
government which in a few years, will degenerate to a compleat Aristocracy, 
armed with powers unnecessary in any case to bestow, and which in its 
vortex swallows up every other Government upon the Continent. In short, my 
fellow-citizens, it can be said to be nothing less than a hasty stride to 
Universal Empire in this Western World, flattering, very flattering to 
young ambitious minds, but fatal to the liberties of the people.

The "Impartial Examiner" wrote essays for the Virginia Independent 
Chronicle in 1788. This is from his first essay:

But surely, when this doctrine comes to be applied to the proposed federal 
constitution, which is framed with such large and extensive powers, as to 
transfer the individual sovereignty from each state to the aggregate body, 
– a constitution, which delegates to Congress an authority to interfere 
with, and restrain the legislatures of every state – invests them with 
supreme powers of legislation throughout all the states – annihilates the 
separate independency of each; and, in short – swallows up and involves in 
the plenitude of its jurisdiction all other powers whatsoever: – I shall 
not be taxed with arrogance in declaring such an argument to be fallacious.

Patrick Henry (1736–1799) made several speeches against adopting the 
Constitution in the Virginia ratifying convention in 1788. This is from his 
speech of June 5:

Here is a revolution as radical as that which separated us from Great 
Britain. It is as radical, if in this transition, our rights and privileges 
are endangered, and the sovereignty of the States be relinquished: And 
cannot we plainly see, that this is actually the case?

This is from his speech of June 9:

A number of characters, of the greatest eminence in this country, object to 
this government for its consolidating tendency. This is not imaginary. It 
is a formidable reality. If consolidation proves to be as mischievous to 
this country as it has been to other countries, what will the poor 
inhabitants of this country do? This government will operate like an 
ambuscade. It will destroy the state governments, and swallow the liberties 
of the people, without giving them previous notice.

And then there is the aforementioned Brutus; once again, from his first essay:

It is true this government is limited to certain objects, or to speak more 
properly, some small degree of power is still left to the states, but a 
little attention to the powers vested in the general government, will 
convince every candid man, that if it is capable of being executed, all 
that is reserved for the individual states must very soon be annihilated.

Those in the Pennsylvania ratification convention who objected to the 
proposed Constitution published The Address and Reasons of Dissent of the 
Minority of the Convention of Pennsylvania to Their Constituents in the 
Pennsylvania Packet and Daily Advertiser on December 18, 1787. Here are 
four pertinent selections:

The powers vested in Congress by this constitution, must necessarily 
annihilate and absorb the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of 
the several states, and produce from their ruins one consolidated 
government, which from the nature of things will be an iron banded 
despotism, as nothing short of the supremacy of despotic sway could connect 
and govern these United States under one government.

The new government will not be a confederacy of states, as it ought, but 
one consolidated government, founded upon the destruction of the several 
governments of the states.

The legislative power vested in Congress by the foregoing recited sections, 
is so unlimited in its nature; may be so comprehensive and boundless its 
exercise, that this alone would be amply sufficient to annihilate the state 
governments, and swallow them up in the grand vortex of general empire.

The powers vested by this constitution in Congress, will effect a 
consolidation of the states under one government, which even the advocates 
of this constitution admit, could not be done without the sacrifice of all 
liberty.

<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0976344815/104-8208774-0223107?ie=UTF8&tag=lewrockwell&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=0976344815>
[]
The Anti-federalists were right. We don’t need to return to the government 
of the Framers of the Constitution, we need to return to the government 
that the Framers destroyed. And furthermore, Constitution or no 
Constitution: The centralization of power is always a great evil.

All quotations from the Anti-federalists are taken from Regnery edition of 
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895262606/lewrockwell/>The 
Anti-Federalists: Selected Writings and Speeches, edited by Bruce Frohnen.

March 5, 2007

Laurence M. Vance [<mailto:lmvance at juno.com>send him mail] is a freelance 
writer and an adjunct instructor in accounting at Pensacola Junior College 
in Pensacola, FL. He is also the director of the 
<http://www.franciswayland.org/>Francis Wayland Institute. He is the author 
of 
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0976344807/lewrockwell/>Christianity 
and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State. His latest book is 
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0976344815/104-8208774-0223107?ie=UTF8&tag=lewrockwell&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=0976344815>King 
James, His Bible, and Its Translators. Visit 
<http://www.vancepublications.com/>his website.

Copyright © 2007 LewRockwell.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c50f.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c51f.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 133 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0001.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c52f.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 295 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0002.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c53e.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 141 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0003.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c54e.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 302 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0004.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c55e.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 135 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0005.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c56d.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 297 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0006.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c57d.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 174 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0007.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22c57d.jpg
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7371 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20070305/65fb0c51/attachment-0008.obj 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list